Potential interest in the lawsuit to prevent future harm (A comparative study)

Abstract

If the origin is that the lawsuit is not accepted unless the interest in it exists that is there has actually been an assault on the right or the legal position to be protected. But this principle has become interpreted with a lot of expansion in many of the jurisprudence and the judiciary and it took place to Any interest in being precautionary in terms of the harm that may occur to the plaintiff, just as the person, even if he does not dispute his right, has an interest in being reassured if the circumstances indicate something that undermines this reassurance, in addition to the consequences of resorting to the judiciary in such cases from the judiciary on the source of the dispute in the future by confirming the judiciary of the right. The law has allowed anyone who has been exposed to in his possession or has embarked on a business not in the plaintiffs real estate but rather in the defendants real estate, that the plaintiff may resort to the judiciary asking for protection for his right by preventing exposure by filing a lawsuit to prevent exposure to prevent future damage or filing a lawsuit to stop new business so that if it was left, it would cause damage in the future through a lawsuit to stop the new business.